A shareholder agreement between Steve Wynn and ex-wife Elaine Wynn has been invalidated by a Clark County District Court judge, issuing an order that also dismisses any claims Elaine Wynn may have pursued in a case that pits Wynn Resorts against Aruze USA.

Steve Wynn Elaine WynnA judge invalidated a shareholders agreement between Steve and Elaine Wynn, allowing both to potentially sell their stock in Wynn Resorts. (Image: Isaac Brekken/AP)

As a result of the order, the Wynns now have the ability to sell shares in Wynn Resorts. Steve Wynn, the former Chairman and CEO of the company, currently holds about 11.8 percent of the company’s shares, while Elaine Wynn holds 9.4 percent.

Regulators Might Want Steve Wynn Out

The ability for Steve Wynn to sell shares in the company may prove important. Gaming regulators in both Nevada and Massachusetts are currently conducting investigations into Wynn’s suitability as an owner. While Wynn is no longer on the board of directors for the company, regulators could decide that his significant stake makes him more influential in the corporation’s affairs than officials are comfortable with.

Elaine was granted nearly half of Steve Wynn’s stake in Wynn Resorts in 2010 following their divorce, but the shareholder agreement prevented her from having control over her stock. In 2016, she told a court that she had agreed to let Steve Wynn retain control of her stock so that he could better protect their mutual interest in the company, which didn’t always align with those of Kazuo Okada and Aruze USA.

Elaine Wynn argued that this was no longer necessary once the company had redeemed Aruze’s shares, which happened in 2012. But Aruze USA was still part of the shareholders agreement.

That changed last week,  included an agreement from Aruze not to consider itself a party to the shareholders agreement, leaving only Elaine and Steve Wynn to contest whether it should still be in effect.

The agreement between the former couple was one of the many issues still under litigation in the broader shareholder case. The Clark County District Court expected to hear 20 additional motions related to the case on Friday morning.

Decision to Sell Could Shape Company’s Future

Steve Wynn following a string of sexual harassment and sexual assault allegations against him.

Wynn has vehemently denied all of the claims against him, and has suggested that Elaine Wynn has been clandestinely trying to ruin his reputation as part of a campaign to get a more favorable result in the battle over their shareholder agreement.

If either Steve or Elaine Wynn decide that they wish to sell their shares, there are a number of possibilities as to how that could play out. It’s possible that Wynn Resorts itself could buy back some of that stock, rather than allow it to be sold on the open market.

That could also help the company better control any future decisions over mergers or acquisitions, as large shareholders like Steve and Elaine Wynn would currently have significant influence over any votes on the firm’s future.

Everi Excellence Possible as Analyst Boosts Estimates Through 2022 on Fintech, Gaming Beats  Philippines Casino Regulator Delivers Federal Government $170M in First Quarter Taxes  South Korea’s Paradise City Casino Falling Short of Utopian Projections  Flutter Entertainment Introduces £/€500 Monthly Loss Limit for Under 25s  POGOs Don’t Offer Gambling to China: PAGCOR Responds to Beijing Threat  New Orleans Saints Favored in Battle Against Slumping Indianapolis Colts on Monday Night Football  NHL Could Get up to $90 Million in Sportradar Stock Through Data Agreement  Star Entertainment to Aussie Government: You Want Gold Coast Investment, We Want Exclusivity  UK Gaming Industry Rebuffs Calls for Online Gamblers to Prove They Can Afford Losses  FanDuel Officially Launches Mobile Sportsbook in West Virginia, Announces Dates for Iowa, Indiana Retail Books